Top: M16A1 Bottom: M16A2
The M16A2. After two
decades of service, the M16A2 replaced the M16A1. The differences between the
two weapons effectively converted the M16A2 into a more traditional military
rifle. This fit the Marine Corps vision
of a general issue rifle. In a nutshell,
the M16A2 had an increased rifle twist for a new 5.56 NATO cartridge, a
lengthened butt stock, finger grove pistol grip, three shot burst control
replacing the full auto capability, a redesigned rear sight which increased the
range graduations to 800 meters, an improved flash suppressor, and a heavier
barrel which gave the rifle improved balance in the offhand shooting
position.
M16A2 fired offhand
While these “improvements”
were great for target shooters, a lot of the handling characteristics of the
assault rifle were lost. The Army was
warned about the M16A2 and its 5.56 caliber Ball M855 ammunition by a report
prepared by the Army Research Institute Field unit located at Fort Benning,
Georgia. The M16A2 rifle was now longer and heavier,
well suited for the National Match Course and other target shooting
competitions. Its sighting system was
redesigned to provide settings for distances up to 800 meters. The intent of
the assault rifle, the ability to reliably hit enemy soldiers at ranges of 300
meters and less, was lost. The 3
shot burst was in response to the old full auto, and presumably soldiers, waste
ammunition argument.
Another unhappy coincidence was the widespread use of kevlar
body armor by U.S. troops in the late 1990s.
While in the vests, many smaller stature soldiers could not effectively
sight their longer stocked M16A2 rifles. The M16A2 is outstandingly accurate,
very reliable, and provided good service to U.S. troops in Panama, Desert
Storm, and in the early stages of the Global War on Terror. In the end, it really turned out to be a
heavy, intermediate cartridge, battle rifle, designed to hit targets well
beyond the effective range of its “improved” cartridge.
No comments:
Post a Comment